Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Non-equilibrium Physics and Evolutionã¢â‚¬â€adaptation Extinction and Ecology a Key Issues Review

The Evolution of Morphological Variety

Abstract

The multifariousness of organismic class has evolved nonuniformly during the history of life. Quantitative morphological studies reveal profound changes in evolutionary rates corresponding with the generation of morphological disparity at low taxonomic diversity during the early on radiation of many clades. These studies have too given insight into the relative importance of genomic and ecological factors in macroevolution, the selectivity of extinction, and other bug. Of import progress has been made in the evolution of morphological spaces that can adjust highly disparate forms, although this area all the same needs more attending. Other hereafter directions include the relationship between morphological and ecological diversification, geographic patterns in morphological variety, and the office of morphological disparity as a causal factor in macroevolution.

Keywords

  • Periodical Most Downloaded

Abstruse - Figures Preview

Abstruse

▪ Abstract The literature on effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity is huge. It is besides very various, with dissimilar authors measuring fragmentation in unlike ways and, as a consequence, drawing different conclusions regarding both the ...Read More

  • Figures

image

Figure ane: The procedure of habitat fragmentation, where "a large expanse of habitat is transformed into a number of smaller patches of smaller total area, isolated from each other past a matrix of habita...

image

Figure two: Analogy of habitat loss resulting in some, merely non all, of the other three expected furnishings of habitat fragmentation on landscape pattern. Expected effects are (a) an increase in the due north...

image

Figure 3: Illustration of the typical relationships between habitat corporeality and diverse measures of fragmentation. Individual data points correspond to private landscapes. Based on relationships in...

image

Figure 4: (A) Patch-scale study. Each observation represents the information from a single patch. Only one landscape is studied, so sample size for landscape-scale inferences is 1. (B) Landscape-sc...

image

Figure 5: Both habitat loss and habitat fragmentation per se (independent of habitat loss) upshot in smaller patches. Therefore, patch size itself is ambiguous as a measure of either habitat amount o...

image

Figure six: Landscape in southern Ontario (from Tischendorf 2001) showing that regions where forest patches (black areas) are small typically correspond to regions where at that place is little forest. Compare...

image

Figure 7: Illustration of the human relationship between patch isolation and amount of habitat in the landscape immediately surrounding the patch. Grayness areas are wood. Isolated patches (black patches lab...

image

Effigy viii: Illustration of the extinction threshold hypothesis in comparing to the proportional area hypothesis.


Abstract - Figures - Supplemental Materials Preview

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are numerical tools that combine observations of species occurrence or affluence with environmental estimates. They are used to proceeds ecological and evolutionary insights and to predict distributions beyond landscapes, ...Read More

Supplemental Materials

This supplement provides additional references for the information in our review, following the same structure as the main article. We accept selectively listed papers that will either lead to a useful breadth or depth of others, illustrate a detail concept or application, or represent dissimilar environments, model uses or promising new approaches. Read More

  • Figures

Effigy 1: The human relationship between mapped species and environmental data (left), ecology space (middle), and mapped predictions from a model only using environmental predictors (right). Note tha...

Effigy ii: Dissimilarities between 2000 A.D. climates and those (inside 500 km of a target site) estimated for 2100 A.D. using multimodel ensembles for the A2 scenario of the IPCC fourth cess rep...


Abstract Preview

Abstract

AbstractEcological changes in the phenology and distribution of plants and animals are occurring in all well-studied marine, freshwater, and terrestrial groups. These observed changes are heavily biased in the directions predicted from global warming and ...Read More


Abstract - Figures Preview

Abstract

Species multifariousness is a major determinant of ecosystem productivity, stability, invasibility, and nutrient dynamics. Hundreds of studies spanning terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems show that loftier-variety mixtures are approximately twice as ...Read More

  • Figures

Effigy ane: Relationships amid species richness, functional composition, and ecosystem function. Increasing species number (a) increases drought resistance; high resistance is associated with a low rat...

Figure 2: Theoretical considerations of biodiversity and ecosystem performance. (a) Species coexistence and overyielding for the Lotka-Volterra competition model, with N1 and N2 representing affluence...

Figure 3: Diversity and stability of communities and species. (a,b) Predictions based on a model of resource competition in a temporally fluctuating environment, showing dependence of (a) community te...

Figure 4: Case written report of the big Cedar Creek biodiversity experiment. (a,c) Aboveground and (b,d) root biomass responses in 2006, the thirteenth year of the experiment, as dependent on (a,b) number of ...

Figure 5: Multifunctionality and diversity. At each of 8 European sites, different sets of species were involved in the provisioning of different ecosystem services. Because of this, many more spe...

Figure 6: Importance of biodiversity relative to other ecological factors. Differences in biomass product between various treatment and control plots, showing effects of sixteen-versus-1-, 16-versus-2-,...



Encounter More

ramaciottiopetchas63.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.129